Mark Carras
07-15-2007, 10:49 PM
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a North Carolina case, Capitol v. Frye, the RIAA has accepted a $300 offer of judgment made by the defendant. This is the first known use, in the RIAA v. Consumer cases, of the formal offer of judgment procedure which provides that if the plaintiff doesn't accept the offer, and doesn't later get a judgment for a larger amount, the plaintiff is responsible for all of the court costs from that point on in the case. The accepted judgment in the Frye case (PDF) also contains an injunction — much more limited than the RIAA's typical 'settlement' injunction (PDF) — under which defendant agreed not to infringe plaintiffs' copyrights."Read more of this story (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/15/2125234&from=rss) at Slashdot.
http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?i=dgCDth</img> (http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?a=dgCDth)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/134074959
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/134074959/article.pl)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?i=dgCDth</img> (http://rss.slashdot.org/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?a=dgCDth)
http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/134074959
More... (http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/134074959/article.pl)