Mark Carras
08-01-2007, 04:30 AM
Harmony writes "When the RIAA sued Sgt. Nicholas Paternoster, it included a screenshot of a shared folder with over 4,600 files — some of which were pornographic images unrelated to the case. Last week, the RIAA got permission from a judge to, as a 'professional courtesy,' swap out the original exhibit for one with only the 350+ songs the defendant is accused of sharing on Kazaa. The RIAA's carelessness may come back to haunt it, however: 'After the suit was filed — and the exhibit made public — Sgt. Paternoster decided to fight back, filing a counterclaim accusing the RIAA of violating his privacy and seeking to "shame Counter-Plaintiff... into giving in to their unreasonable demands regarding their copyrighted materials."'"Read more of this story (http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/31/1233244&from=rss) at Slashdot.
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?i=kDM3qt</img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?a=kDM3qt)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/139196207
More... (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/139196207/article.pl)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?i=kDM3qt</img> (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Slashdot/slashdot?a=kDM3qt)
http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~4/139196207
More... (http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/139196207/article.pl)